Agriculture Land Army Advent Cherpines Chile CIA - LCPEG School Ecology Economy Energy Europe Esper

Hello, This blog is edited by Julien Nicolet. Thank you for your visit and comments that you write in my notes. Thank you abide by the rules set by the Tribune de Genève that hosts us: be polite, concise, relevant and sign your comments! Hope to hear from you. You can also reach me by clicking: here.
Gilles on Bitter René Longet open letter about ... Julien Nicolet TPG: Always slower? Jean Hôtaux peanut shelling machine TPG: Always slower? norbertmaendly on Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ... Patrick Dimier on Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ... Julien Nicolet Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ... briand on Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ... Geo on Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ... cmj on Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ... Duval Mandela: Why RTS she dared invite ...
Agriculture Land Army Advent Cherpines Chile CIA - LCPEG School Ecology Economy Energy Europe Esperanto Gate Gourmet Family peanut shelling machine Geneva World Israel Palestine April Fools Sports Switzerland Transportation Unions Venezuela Votes
"Come, ladies and gentlemen, everyone can win! And one, and two ... a little bit to the left a little bit to the right, and ... your money has disappeared into the pockets of my friends ...! "Scene monte? No, campaign Savings housing. Admit at the outset that the comparison is excessive. Indeed, the sums involved are much larger peanut shelling machine savings in housing and, if we can recognize a wave of talent for conjuring small-time thugs who rip the suckers on the docks, the strings used by the media property and bank accounts peanut shelling machine are much easier to identify, to the point that one wonders if the fixation peanut shelling machine on the monte environments that specifically defend future initiatives on housing savings (March 11 and June 17) does not fall over the fear of competition as safe delirium.
Decoding: Act 1: "Come, ladies and gentlemen, everyone can win." By dangling the outdated fantasy of pool-villa-mutt-4x4 cedar, the initiators dare to believe that their initiatives are aimed at middle class. On examination, one realizes that in order to take full advantage, we need to save 15,000. - Per person or 30,000. - Per couple peanut shelling machine per year. Do the math, do you really think that households can save 2,500 - side. Monthly belong to the middle class? Act 2: "And one, and two ... a little bit to the left a little bit to the right ..." amazing feature of this game, who can not play can still lose. According initiatives, 30,000 -. Spared our "middle class" would be tax deductible. Tax losses will be no doubt huge and bourgeois circles are now replay the game we the Federal Council had knowingly published false predictions to minimize losses to its reform of business peanut shelling machine taxation in 2008. Who said tax losses said to be raising taxes (and thus increased pressure on the real middle class, those who just close their month), or decrease in benefits (and therefore pressure on the most vulnerable and the real middle class who benefit from services of State). Both effects can of course be combined. Act 3: "... and your money has disappeared into the pockets of my friends! ... ". could console themselves by saying that everything will be lost by the middle class and the poor will be recovered by those who can take advantage of these savings peanut shelling machine and thus achieve their dream of private property.
Indeed, real estate is a highly speculative sector. In other words, peanut shelling machine prices are not determined by the amount of work required to create the good materials, and Surcharge providers (as is the case at the butcher or hairdresser), but by the forces of supply and demand. This is particularly evident for the price of land, it is more to that of the frame. Or, create housing savings fund equivalent to putting more money on the part of potential buyers. Mechanically, in a tight market, it will increase the prices of real estate objects. Thus, the apartment worth 800,000 -. Before housing savings will increase its prices approximately what the buyer will have saved in taxes. The same buyers will be able to afford (or not) the same immovable objects, pay the same rent and it is only the sellers who benefit from the gains from savings schemes. So those are the real environments that capture the entire tax loss to the community! For the record, there was exactly the same phenomenon when the French authorities have gradually